At the Old Quaker Meeting House

This is a serious poetry forum not a "love-in". Post here for more detailed, constructive criticism.
Post Reply
Antcliff
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 6582
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:35 am
Location: At the end of stanza 3

At the Old Quaker Meeting House

Post by Antcliff » Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:44 pm

v2

I'll not forget the obvious goodness
of these Quakers,
who don't wear the dark hats
and dress the part

but who still dress simply;
as if some needless layer of appearance
has fallen away
unmissed as a paid up debt.

The dust here is of dormancy
not decay.
They are not of heaven
but shake hands beneath it.

Nor is virtue out in front.
It plays unnoticed, the good drummer.
My pride is disarmed by them,
as it should be. I can sit at ease.



....
v1.
I'll not forget the obvious goodness
of these Quakers,
who don't wear the dark hats
and dress the part,

but who still dress simply;
as if some needless layer of appearance
has fallen away,
unmissed as debt.

The dust here is of dormancy
not decay.
They are not of heaven,
but they shake hands beneath it.

Nor is virtue out in front.
It plays unnoticed, the good drummer.
My pride is smothered by them,
as it should be. I can sit at ease.



(....an older one, reviewing)
Last edited by Antcliff on Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:52 pm, edited 4 times in total.
We fray into the future, rarely wrought
Save in the tapestries of afterthought.
Richard Wilbur

Macavity
Perspicacious Poster
Perspicacious Poster
Posts: 5261
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 10:29 am

Re: At the Old Quaker Meeting House

Post by Macavity » Sun Dec 30, 2012 1:34 am

hi Seth,
The 'humility' in the voice seemed in tune with the peacefulness of the Quakers that you present. I think the poem is seeking to use plain language in keeping with the subject, but part of me wonders if it has become austere (more Puritan than Quaker).

mac
Last edited by Macavity on Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:11 am, edited 3 times in total.

pseud
Perspicacious Poster
Perspicacious Poster
Posts: 2867
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 1:19 am
Location: St. Louis, MO

Re: At the Old Quaker Meeting House

Post by pseud » Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:12 am

very, very well done. Change carefully.
"Don't treat your common sense like an umbrella. When you come into a room to philosophize, don't leave it outside, but bring it in with you." Wittgenstein

dedalus
Preternatural Poster
Preternatural Poster
Posts: 1933
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 3:51 am
Location: Ireland/Japan

Re: At the Old Quaker Meeting House

Post by dedalus » Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:44 am

Good people, the Quakers. Put other noisy so-called "Christians" to shame, I'd be thinking ....

User avatar
twoleftfeet
Perspicacious Poster
Perspicacious Poster
Posts: 6723
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Standing by a short pier, looking for a long run-up

Re: At the Old Quaker Meeting House

Post by twoleftfeet » Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:39 pm

Seth,

Excellent piece.

There are two (minor) issues for me -

"unmissed as debt"
- the construct is ambiguous.
Also a tad cryptic, possibly because you are forcing your metaphor into 4 syllables to tie in with S1?

"smothered"
- could suggest coercion as well. Is that your intention?
Shoot me for suggesting a cliche, if you like, but "disarmed"? :)

Geoff
Instead of just sitting on the fence - why not stand in the middle of the road?

Antcliff
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 6582
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:35 am
Location: At the end of stanza 3

Re: At the Old Quaker Meeting House

Post by Antcliff » Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:51 pm

Thanks Pseud/Caleb,
very good to hear.
I'm hoping not to change it greatly.

Thanks Mac,
You have me thinking about austerity!

Thanks Bren,
yeh, they are my favourites.

Thanks Geoff.
for kind words and the two points.
"smothered"
- could suggest coercion as well. Is that your intention?
Good spot. That is not my intention..no coercion implications intended. I'm drawn to your suggestion of "disarmed" and will try it perhaps, though I am also very drawn to "levelled" because of historical connections with the Levellers. Hmm...
"unmissed as debt"
- the construct is ambiguous.
Also a tad cryptic, possibly because you are forcing your metaphor into 4 syllables to tie in with S1?
I have tweaked there.

Seth
We fray into the future, rarely wrought
Save in the tapestries of afterthought.
Richard Wilbur

David
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13534
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin

Re: At the Old Quaker Meeting House

Post by David » Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:09 pm

Two good suggestions by Geoff, deftly tweaked, and this is a very nice poem. I think you're okay with the Quakers (as opposed to the Puritans) - I always think the Puritans have a sort of vehemence that the Quakers, sensibly, lack.

Cheers

David

Ros
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7965
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 4:53 pm
antispam: no
Location: this hill-shadowed city/of razors and knives.
Contact:

Re: At the Old Quaker Meeting House

Post by Ros » Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:20 pm

Sorry to keep on about this, but I think you could lose all the end of line commas :)

but they shake hands beneath it.

and lose the 'they'?

Very nice.

Ros
Rosencrantz: What are you playing at? Guildenstern: Words. Words. They're all we have to go on.
___________________________
Antiphon - www.antiphon.org.uk

Antcliff
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 6582
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:35 am
Location: At the end of stanza 3

Re: At the Old Quaker Meeting House

Post by Antcliff » Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:58 pm

Thanks Ros.
"they"...axed. And some commas. :D You are right.

Seth
We fray into the future, rarely wrought
Save in the tapestries of afterthought.
Richard Wilbur

Post Reply